Monday, March 31, 2008

Wiki Removal Douche

It seems like some douch bag over at Wiki is removing my site from all the pages about Akira as he deems the site inappropriate. Some turd of a man who actually doesn’t understand the guidelines he so often points people towards, who has nothing better to do with his time other than take a grudge out on the site. The clue? the fact that BlueBladeAkira remains in the links section to the Akira (Manga) page and Akira2019 was removed, strange methinks. If one is relevant, then the other is also. Here’s what the dick left me on my talk page, my reply is after.
Akira (film)

“Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Akira (film). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article’s talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — ReyBrujo (talk) 11:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)”

- I just love how he says “please do not ADD inappropriate links to Wikipedia” - like I’ve just come along and added it, no, I was there first, the link has been there for years, he removed it, does he have alzheimer’s or something? Would you all say this is a pretty appropriate site to link on a Wki page about Akira? I certainly would. I don’t get how some people just think they have more right over others when it comes to Wiki, he’s just some loser sat at home, much like me really, who has no right to be bossing people about or thinking he knows what’s right when he clearly doesn’t. You know what, the link was already there, so maybe he should have discussed why it should be removed on the talk page instead of just removing it. Practice what you preach mate.
Akira External Links

“Can you please explain to me how BlueBladeAkira remains in the Akira (Manga) page and how Akira2019.com was removed? You was the last to edit it and it seems you removed one and not the other. It seems like you are taking an over zealous approach to what links can and can’t be included based on your personal opinion. I’ve read the guidelines and still see akira2019.com as the most relevant link there is to any article about Akira. Seems like nothing more than a grudge against the site. Just explain how RottenTomatoes and BlueBladeAkira are deemed relevant and Akira2019.com isn’t? as per these articles -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided

You seem to have zoned in on one singular part of the links to be avoided article, mainly this part 4. Links mainly intended to promote a website. I think you are missing the point of this rule, the ‘MAINLY INTENDED’ part. if I was only ‘mainly intending’ to promote a site I would have linked any old irrelevant site, but instead I am linking a massive Akira resource, in fact, the largest on the web. The site has also been part of the links section along with BlueBladeAkira since Feb 2006 when I was editing the page back then. I didn’t realise someone would come along with a skewed perspective on what constitutes official and relevant, and what is allowed to be apart of Wiki. in fact I often remove irrelevant links myself, such as Otomo’s Freedom project link from the Akira (Manga) page because this is an irrelevant link, Akira2019.com on the other hand isn’t. I’ve already spent too much time thinking about this, do as you wish, a better man walks away in the right. –Damn-Deal-Done (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)”

I left this on the Akira (Film) talk page.
External Links

“”If the link is to a relevant and informative site” - Akira2019.com has been linked since feb 2006, added by me and has remained there for a long time. It is one of the, if not the most relevant site about Akira and therefore, for this wiki. Someone also mentioned only “official sites please” when removing Akira2019.com from the links. Well I wouldn’t exactly call Rotten Tomatoes site official, it’s a tiny review, how is that more relevant than a site that is aimed at every facet of Akira. What makes a site “official”? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damn-Deal-Done (talk • contribs) 11:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)”

- Well I’ve had my rant. People like him really get my feckles up. Just another crashing boar ready to tell people NO! at every step because it makes him feel big and important - editing a open source he had no part in creating, I hope he gets piles or worse, fuck him. Crashing boar, dick, motherfucker, If I was Jack Black I would give you such a karate chop to the neck, eat shit. :)